🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.